Article
Illustrations by Carolyn Ridsdale

Should Lunch Be Longer?

For many kids, there isn’t enough time to eat.

By Mackenzie Carro
From the February 2022 Issue

Shutterstock.com

It’s 12:00 p.m.—lunchtime at last. You make a beeline for the cafeteria. It’s pizza day, so you know you’ve got to get there quick. You walk through the doors and join the long line.

The minutes tick by. Your stomach grumbles as you glance at the clock. It’s 12:12. The lunch period is nearly half over!

Finally, you get your food, scramble to a seat, and start to chow down when—RRRRING!

You shove a big bite of pizza in your mouth before scurrying back to class.

If this sounds familiar, you’re not alone. Lunch periods in the United States vary, but in many schools, students have around 25 minutes. When you consider how long it takes to get to the cafeteria, wait in line, and take a bathroom break, there isn’t much time left to eat. Sometimes kids only have five minutes.

Experts say this time crunch is doing students a disservice. Having more time to eat, they say, would lead to less food waste, improved learning, and healthier habits. Both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the School Nutrition Association recommend students get at least 20 minutes to eat after they’ve been seated.

That’s why today, some schools have started making lunch periods longer.

Should more schools do the same?

YES: We need more time

By Jeremy Mitchell

Lunch periods weren’t always so short. In the past, students got closer to 40 minutes. Then about a decade ago, schools began shortening lunch to make time for extra instruction in core subjects, like reading and math. But when it comes to learning, shortening lunch is actually counterproductive.

“[Lunch] is a time for students to recharge and connect with their peers so that they can go back to the classroom ready to learn again,” says Juliana Cohen, a nutrition professor at Harvard University who researches school lunch. In other words, students need a break in order to focus in their afternoon classes.

Extending lunch also leads to healthier choices. According to Cohen’s research, kids with at least 25 minutes of sit-down time eat more veggies and fruit. (If you only have five minutes, who can spare the time to peel an orange?) That’s not all. Longer lunch is good for the environment too. A 2021 study showed that the more time kids have, the more of their lunch they eat—so less food ends up in the trash. The study appeared in a medical journal called JAMA Network Open.

Now, some say we should make lunch lines more efficient rather than make lunch periods longer. But that’s not enough. We all need a break during the day, and 25 minutes doesn’t cut it. Kids in France get up to a whole hour ! So what are we waiting for?

NO: There are better solutions

By Kayla Boado

No one disagrees that all students (and teachers!) deserve enough time to eat. But extending lunch isn’t the solution. For one thing, school schedules are jam-packed. If lunch got longer, would class periods have to get shorter? That could make it hard for our teachers to get through all the material we need to learn. Or would the school day get longer? That could cause scheduling conflicts with after-school activities like sports and chess club.

Fortunately, there are other solutions. One idea? Add more grab-and-go meal options in the cafeteria. That would save kids from wasting so much time standing in line. Another way to speed up lines would be to stagger lunch. Instead of a whole grade eating at once, smaller groups could eat at different times.

We could also take a cue from other countries. In Japan, for example, kids don’t wait in a long line to get their food—it’s brought to them in their classroom. That system is a lot more efficient.

So yes, we need more time to eat. But we don’t need to disrupt our entire school day to get it.

Scavenger Hunt

Directions:

For each essay, complete the following steps on your own document:

1. Identify the central claim.

2. Identify two pieces of supporting evidence.

3. Identify the counterclaim.

4. Identify the rebuttal

Now Decide: Who makes the stronger argument?

This article was originally published in the February 2022 issue.

Audio ()
Activities (8)
Answer Key (1)
Audio ()
Activities (8)
Answer Key (1)
Step-by-Step Lesson Plan

Close Reading, Critical Thinking, Skill Building

1. PREPARING TO READ

2. READING AND TEXT MARKING

3. DISCUSSING

5. DEBATING

6. WRITING

Text-to-Speech